About

Verification ledger

We tell readers that every cited source is checked on a schedule. This is the record of that, published in full including what failed. Last run August 15, 2026.

Last run

What the check covered

Pages examined: 284
Source URLs checked: 1,853
Responded normally: 1,499 (80.9%)
Reachable but bot-guarded: 335 (18.1%)
Failed: 19 (1.0%)

A source that answers a browser but refuses an automated request is counted separately rather than as a failure. Government and registry sites do this routinely, and treating it as link rot would mean pulling good citations. Only a URL that a real fetch cannot reach twice counts as failed.

Not hidden

The 19 citations that failed

These are live on the site now and are being repaired. Publishing them is the point: a verification claim that only ever reports success is not a check, it is a slogan.

https://dre.colorado.gov/sites/dre/files/documents/Seller 404 cited by states/colorado
https://realestate.naver.com 0 cited by comparisons/south-korea
https://stat.gov.ua/en/datasets/housing-market-price-changes 404 cited by posts/ukraine-real-estate-market
https://www.arbeiterkammer.at/bestellerprinzip 404 cited by countries/austria
https://www.bj.admin.ch/bj/en/home/wirtschaft/grundstueckerwerb.html 404 cited by countries/switzerland
https://www.chinabank.ph/chinabank-offers-market-lowest-6-percent-home-loan-rate 404 cited by posts/philippines-real-estate-market
https://www.dxbanalytics.com/blog/dubai-property-price-index-2026 404 cited by posts/united-arab-emirates-real-estate-market
https://www.gc.nh.gov/rsa/html/V/78-B/78-B-mrg.htm 0 cited by states/new-hampshire
https://www.gc.nh.gov/rsa/html/XLVIII/477/477-4-a.htm 0 cited by states/new-hampshire
https://www.gc.nh.gov/rsa/html/XLVIII/477/477-4-d.htm 0 cited by states/new-hampshire
https://www.gc.nh.gov/rsa/html/XLVIII/478/478-17-g.htm 0 cited by states/new-hampshire
https://www.gov.uk/find-an-energy-certificate 404 cited by guides/list-your-home-on-rightmove-and-zoopla-without-an-estate-agent
https://www.ilent.nl/onderwerpen/productlabels-markeringen-en-energiemaatregelen/energielabel/energielabel-gebouwen/energielabel-woningen 404 cited by countries/netherlands, cities/the-hague, cities/utrecht
https://www.lantmateriet.se/en/real-property/registration-of-ownership--property-and-site-leasehold/ 404 cited by countries/sweden
https://www.lantmateriet.se/en/real-property/registration-of-ownership--property-and-site-leasehold/stamp-duty-and-fees/ 404 cited by countries/sweden
https://www.scbar.org/for-lawyers/quicklinks/legal-resources/ethics-advisory-opinion-05-16/ 404 cited by states/south-carolina
https://www.svit.ch/en/members 404 cited by agent-finders/switzerland
https://www.trec.texas.gov/22-tac-%C2%A753762-standard-contract-form-trec-no-55-0-sellers-disclosure-notice 404 cited by cities/houston
https://www.unissu.com/proptech-resources/naver-real-estate 404 cited by comparisons/south-korea

How it runs

What happens to a page that fails

The job runs on a fixed schedule over half the corpus at a time, so every page comes round roughly monthly rather than all of them being restamped on one day. A page whose citations all respond is recorded clean. A page with a dead citation is held back: it is not re-dated and not presented as freshly reviewed until the citation is fixed, because moving a review date on a page we have not actually repaired would be the exact freshness signal readers should distrust. 16 pages are held back from the last run.

A page's review date changes when the page itself changes. It does not move because a scheduled job ran.